What does surveillance imply in the context of organizational learning?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the ASU COM259 Midterm Exam with comprehensive flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question is accompanied by detailed hints and explanations. Get ready to excel in your Communication in Business and Professions exam!

Surveillance, in the context of organizational learning, centers around the practice of observing others to gain information. This process is crucial for understanding how knowledge is created, shared, and utilized within an organization. By observing the actions, decisions, and interactions of colleagues, employees can glean insights that contribute to enhancing their own skills and improving overall team performance.

Organizations benefit from this type of surveillance as it fosters a culture of continuous learning and adaptation. It encourages employees to be aware of the practices of their peers, to learn from both successes and mistakes, and to identify potential areas for improvement or innovation. This organic method of learning through observation promotes engagement and encourages collaborative environments where sharing knowledge becomes a norm.

The other options present different dimensions of observation and oversight. Monitoring employee performance through evaluation typically involves more structured methods of assessment rather than informal observation for learning purposes. Imposing strict oversight on all activities suggests a controlling atmosphere that could limit creativity and open communication, which are vital for effective learning. Following guidelines without question lacks the proactive learning aspect that surveillance in the context of observational learning emphasizes, where understanding and adaptation are key components.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy